Next week is exhibition day. Today, every team reads their poster content out loud. Every team gets feedback. Every team leaves knowing exactly what to fix before the form deadline.
Every team reads their 8 draft answers to the class.
Structured critique using the rubric — specific and useful only.
Leave with a clear action list. Finalize and submit the Google Form before the deadline.
Read draft answers out loud. Get feedback. Note what to fix.
Fix your answers. Submit the Google Form officially before the deadline.
Teacher runs the poster generator. All A3 posters printed.
Your poster is on the wall. You stand next to it and present to visitors.
What you submit in the form is exactly what goes on the poster. No edits after the deadline.
Final score = 60% judge rubric + 40% audience ranked-choice vote
After each team reads their answers, the class gives structured feedback in three parts.
One section that was specific, clear, and well-argued. Not "it was good" — name the section and say why it worked: "Your limitations section was strong because you gave two concrete failure scenarios with real consequences."
Something you weren't convinced by, framed as a question: "How would your system handle inputs in Lebanese dialect?" or "I wasn't sure what bias type you were referring to — can you name it specifically?"
Something concrete they can fix before submitting: "Add a specific mitigation strategy to your bias section" or "Your real-world example needs to compare your system to the existing one — not just name it."
Not a bias strategy. Name the bias type — historical, sampling, label, feedback loop — and describe a specific mitigation. "Good data" tells a judge nothing.
Every AI system can cause harm. Give a real harm scenario and a real safeguard. Pretending there are no risks loses points immediately.
Not a failure case. Format it properly: user does X → system outputs Y → consequence is Z. Two of these. Specific. Real.
Name the ML type. Classification? Regression? Recommendation? NLP? Computer vision? Not naming it costs you a full rubric criteria point.
Not enough. Name the specific system, then explain how yours differs or improves on it. Comparison is the whole point of the real-world examples section.
Your answers go directly onto the poster as prose. Bullet points break the layout. Every answer must be written in full sentences — 3 to 5 of them.
Your answers go directly onto an A3 sheet. That changes how you write.
Incorporate all feedback from today. Go section by section against the rubric. Every answer should score a 3 before you submit.
Submit officially before the deadline. If you already submitted a draft, edit it. No submissions accepted after the deadline — no exceptions.
At least one photo in the form. Team photo, diagram, mockup, screenshot — anything visual. The poster needs it.
Form deadline: [ Teacher writes deadline here ]